Save Battery Park City's Trees

Trees are already being cut down. BPCA has never even applied for the federal variance that could save them.

Trees in south Battery Park near 3rd Place are already gone — and this is just the beginning. Send an email demanding a pause until every alternative has been evaluated.

Send the Email Now
1. Click above 2. Add your name 3. Hit send

Or scroll down to copy the email text and send from your email account manually.

What's happening?

BPCA is removing 435 mature trees[1] (~40 years old) and planting 450 new saplings.[1] Cutting has already started — trees in south Battery Park near 3rd Place are already gone.[13] BPCA classified this as "no significant adverse impact"[2] because the replacement count is slightly higher.
That's 37% of every tree in the project area destroyed.[2] Of those 435, BPCA is considering transplanting just 17 — less than 4%.[1] The remaining 418 will be cut down, in a project with a $1.6 billion budget.
WhereTrees removed[8]
North Cove120
South Esplanade125
N. Moore St / West St65
Rockefeller Park35
South Cove35
North Esplanade30
Lily Pond / Ferry Terminal25
Total435
BPCA can save these trees. The same Army Corps regulations they cite include a built-in process — the Vegetation Variance Request — that allows trees to be preserved when site-specific analysis supports it.[4] BPCA never filed one.[6] Their own Draft EIS committed to exploring the variance process — but that language was struck from the Final EIS.[7]
BPCA lumps all 395 healthy tree removals into one category: "project construction."[1] But not all removals are the same. Some trees are in the wall footprint. Some are in the 15-foot zone. Some are in temporary staging areas. Some are being cut because building around them costs more. BPCA has never disclosed which trees fall into which category — making it impossible to identify which ones could be saved.
A mature canopy tree intercepts 1,000+ gallons of stormwater per year, provides cooling, carbon capture, and habitat. A sapling won't match that for 20-30 years. Removing mature trees in a resilience project is a step backwards.

Communities have stopped this before

Sacramento, 2025 — Army Corps planned to cut 700+ trees for levee work. A federal judge blocked all cutting after the community proved alternatives weren't explored.
San Antonio, 2022 — City planned to remove 105 trees for park renovation. Community pressure cut it to fewer than 50 — more than half saved.
Nationwide, 2014 — The Army Corps had a policy requiring tree removal within 15 feet of levees — the same rule BPCA is citing now. It was reversed after communities and environmental groups pushed back.
Coeur d'Alene, 2012 — Army Corps ordered 1,000+ mature pines removed from a levee. The community fought back, and only dead trees were removed. The rest were saved.
Virginia, 2024 — The National Park Service was already cutting trees when the community caught it and mobilized. All removal was halted. It's not too late.
Read the full stories →

The email makes 3 demands

Send it manually?

To: info.bpc@bpca.ny.gov, foil@bpca.ny.gov, nwbpcrinfo@bpca.ny.gov, clinton.plummer@bpca.ny.gov

CC: hello@kavanagh.nyc, district1@council.nyc.gov, info@manhattanbp.nyc.gov, glickd@nyassembly.gov, jgennaro@council.nyc.gov, harckham@nysenate.gov, man01@cb.nyc.gov, kavanagh@nysenate.gov, info@dangoldmanforny.com, Scheduling_schumer@schumer.senate.gov, fallc@nyassembly.gov, Edgar.Santana@exec.ny.gov, media@audubon.org, Press.Office@exec.ny.gov, yuhline@yuhlineforsenate.com, cmarte@council.nyc.gov, jlowbeer@yahoo.com, GovernorsIslandCoalition@gmail.com, layla@laylaforny.com, ourpark@eastriverparkaction.org, ban62007@gmail.com, info@seaportcoalition.org, zeldin.lee@epa.gov, senator@schumer.senate.gov, senator@gillibrand.senate.gov, casework@gillibrand.senate.gov, dan.goldman@mail.house.gov, Governor.Hochul@exec.ny.gov, nicole.migliore@exec.ny.gov, press@governor.ny.gov, mamdaniz@nyassembly.gov, press@zohranfornyc.com, raju.mann@bpca.ny.gov, mjgmartha@gmail.com

Subject: Pause Tree Removal Pending Assessment — North/West Resilience Project

Also contact these officials

These leaders have direct influence over BPCA or the federal rules it cites — but only accept messages through their websites. Take 2 minutes to send each one a note asking them to intervene.

Sources

  1. BPCA Final EIS — Response to Comments (May 2025) — Table 10-1: 435 trees removed, 450 planted, per-reach breakdown; ~395 due to construction, ~40 due to health; deployable barrier locations; USACE vegetation policy discussion
  2. BPCA Final EIS — Chapter 3.5 Natural Resources (May 2025) — tree inventory (1,181 trees, 69 species); impact assessment; "no significant adverse impact" determination
  3. The Broadsheet — "Going to the Wall" — BPCA cites USACE 15-ft vegetation-free zone
  4. USACE EP 1110-2-18 — Guidelines for Landscape Planting and Vegetation Management at Levees, Floodwalls, Embankment Dams, and Appurtenant Structures (May 2019) — Section 2-2: vegetation-free zone primary purpose is access; Section 1-2(b): variance process for preserving natural resources; Section 3-3: floodwall-specific provisions. Supersedes ETL 1110-2-583
  5. Downtown Phoenix — Central Station tree relocation — 20 mature trees successfully relocated during redevelopment
  6. Battery Alliance v. BPCA — Petitioners' Memorandum of Law (Nov 2025) — confirms BPCA never applied for vegetation variance (p. 8); cites ETL 1110-2-583 Section 2-2(c)(3)(d); pending in NY Supreme Court, Index No. 162911/2025
  7. BPCA Final EIS — Executive Summary (May 2025) — ES-17/18: tree removal and replacement summary; DEIS commitment to explore FEMA variance process struck from Final EIS (visible in strikethrough text)
  8. BPCA — Tree Impacts and Planting (July 2024) — per-reach tree impact maps showing each tree marked for removal, transplanting, or retention; before/after renderings at 5 and 10-15 years
  9. BPCA Environmental Review page — full DEIS/FEIS chapter index and appendices
  10. Battery Alliance (savebpc.org) — community campaign and pending lawsuit
  11. Downtown Magazine — "Fortress or Neighborhood?" — resident concerns about the project
  12. Sen. Kavanagh letter to BPCA — elected officials raised concerns about the South BPC resilience project
  13. @treesbpc on Instagram — community documentation of tree removals already underway in south Battery Park
Send Email or copy & send
manually